A Jolly Good Fala (1945) - Cancelled or Unproduced Cartoon

Previous Cartoon | Next Cartoon

No Cartoon Picture
A Jolly Good Fala

A Jolly Good Fala

A Jolly Good Fala (1945) - Cancelled or Unproduced Cartoon

BCDB Rating: "A Jolly Good Fala" has not yet received enough votes to be rated.
Add Your Vote Now! 2.2552
Post your Comments or Review
This page has been viewed 44 times this month, and 1592 times total.
  • Unproduced / Cancelled Cartoon ProductionUnproducedCancelled
  • Traditional Animation
  • Warner Bros. Cartoons, Inc.
  • Distributed by: Warner Bros.
  • Cartoon Characters: Fala, Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
  • Voice Actors: Stan Freberg.
  • Directed By Robert Clampett.
  • Color
  • U.S.A.  U.S.A.
  • Unproduced or Production Canceled in April of 1945 (Estimate).

Cartoon Summary:

We do not have a synopsis for this cartoon; why don't you send us one?

Cartoon Production Information:

This Looney Tune was scrapped because it focused on Franklin Delano Roosevelt's dog Fala. As Roosevelt passed away suddenly during the development of this cartoon, it was thought in poor taste to continue.

Cartoon Video:

Sorry, we do not have a video of A Jolly Good Fala. If you have one, or know of one on Youtube, Vimeo or any other site, Let Us Know

Submit Additional Information:

Do you have anything to add to this page? Have we made any mistakes... or do you have any additional information about A Jolly Good Fala? If so, we would love to hear from you. Please send us a quick note with your additions or corrections to this page, and we will make the corrections as soon as possible!

Report Errors / Submit Additional Information

Cartoon Comments:

Below are comments about this cartoon submitted by people who have seen this show. Take a look and see what others have said about A Jolly Good Fala. We want to know what you think, too!! Feel free to share your own opinion- we do want to hear from you! You can add your own comments here.

A Jolly Good Falla

Comments By:
SOmetimes the best Looney Tune is the one that "might have been".

0 of 10 people found this comment useful
Was this comment useful to you?